When your organisation relies heavily on technological advancements and software development, you need more robust coders. Candidates who can take your organisation to the next big step should be prioritised. To shortlist these types of candidates from a pool of applicants, you can use the best coding assessment tools.
During a verbal interview, you only hear candidates talk about their skills and experience. But what if you could test their abilities instead? With powerful coder assessment tools, you can now select candidates who truly demonstrate technical proficiency.
In this blog, we explore how and why coding assessment tools are more effective than verbal interviews while hiring technical applicants. This makes sure that the performance of an employee is already checked before they start working for you.
Technology Job Market Statistics
- According to the present analysis, the number of IT jobs can increase from 6 million to 7.1 million within ten years.
- By 2026, more than 90% of businesses globally may be impacted by the lack of IT expertise.
- Ineffective coding techniques cause quality problems in around 60% of software projects.
- Coders spend more than 50% of their time only on debugging applications and software. This suggests that an organisation’s basic coding procedures are inadequate.
- Only 29% of overall software projects are completed on time and within budget. The rest of the projects meet insufficiency in completion, along with major issues in performance.
These statistics make it crucial to utilise the best coding assessment tools and assess the software developers, coders, tech aspirants, and more. It is important to assess and evaluate the true potential before hiring them for your organisation.
Evaluating Performance Before Trusting: Verbal Interviews Vs. Coding Assessment
Hiring managers achieve better results when they assess and evaluate candidates directly instead of just asking about their skills and talent. Today, with the growing number of tech aspirants, job postings attract numerous applications. Rather than dealing with the complexity of shortlisting and interviewing everyone, you can use coding assessments to filter the most promising candidates from the applicant pool. Let’s explore how code assessments outperform verbal one-to-one interviews.
Objective evaluation
When you conduct a coding assessment, you get clear results about a candidate’s technical skills and what prior work they have done. Verbal interviews can involve personal bias. However, with coding assessments, every candidate is given the same set of problems to be solved. You can directly check a candidate’s actual workability rather than listening to their ability to perform things in an interview setting.
Effective testing
The best coding assessment tools create real-world problem scenarios, testing the candidates on a deeper level. This real case test can help you know that the candidates you are going to hire are prepared to deal with such intense situations. This coding assessment can also help you understand how much time an efficient coder spends solving an issue. Measuring the time pressure factor along with accuracy makes sure that you appoint an efficient tech candidate who can complete projects before deadlines. This is not possible to test or evaluate in a verbal interview.
Better insight into knowledge
Sometimes, a successful technological aspirant may be misjudged by their ability to explain things in an interview setting. You can lose a worthy potential candidate because you think they lag in skills, as they lag in making you understand their potential. For candidates who face difficulties in explaining technical concepts verbally, the coding assessment gives them an opportunity to demonstrate their ability directly. Instead of just judging them on theoretical knowledge, coding assessment helps you to have an overall assessment of a candidate.
Best for remote hiring
If your organisation is operating in a remote setup, coding assessments offer a suitable solution for hiring developers across different locations. You don’t need to limit the span of time you need to get personnel to join your team. Choose diversity with sharp-brained coders. The HR team can successfully hire employees by conducting efficient assessments and selecting professionals from all over the world.
Conclusion
It is always better to check what someone can do for you rather than trust what they say they can do. The same goes for verbal interviews. Candidates learn and mug up answers for interviews and make promises about being dedicated to their organisation. They will probably talk highly about their skills and knowledge. It is recommended that the best coding assessment tools be used to see what they can truly perform. Codexpro offers you the best assessment platform to make a smart decision and save your organisation from inefficiency. Make the right choice and move forward!